Friday, November 13, 2015

Enzyme immobilization techniques

Different techniques used for immobilization

Adsorption

Enzyme adsorption results from hydrophobic interactions and salt linkages where either the support is bathed in enzyme for physical adsorption or the enzyme is dried on electrode surfaces. Adsorbed enzymes are shielded from aggregation, proteolysis and interaction with hydrophobic interfaces (Spahn and Minteer 2008). Researchers have used eco-friendly supports like coconut fibers having good water-holding capacity and high cation exchange property; microcrystalline cellulose with irreversible binding capacity; kaolin with high enzyme retainability by chemical acetylation; and micro/mesoporous materials having thiol functionalized, large surface area ideally suited for reduction and oxidation reactions (Dey et al. 2002; Hernández et al. 2007; Karagulyan et al. 2008; Brígida et al. 2010; Mitchell and Ramírez 2011; Huang et al. 2011). Silanized molecular sieves have also been successfully used as supports for enzyme adsorption owing to the presence of silanols on pore walls that facilitate enzyme immobilization by hydrogen bonding (Diaz and Balkus 1996). Various chemical modifications of the currently used supports would definitely help in better immobilization. Water activity profiles of lipase adsorbed using polypropylene-based hydrophobic granules/Accurel EP-100 has been reported (Persson et al. 2000). It would be important to note that Accurel with smaller particle sizes increases reaction rates and enantiomeric ratios during biocatalyzation (Sabbani et al. 2006).
For better process control and economic production, Yarrowia lipolytica lipase was immobilized on octyl-agarose and octadecyl-sepabeads supports by physical adsorption that resulted in higher yields and greater (tenfold) stability than that of free lipase. This was accounted by the hydrophobicity of octadecyl-sepabeads that enhances affinity between the enzyme and support (Cunha et al. 2008). Candida rugosa lipase adsorbed on biodegradable poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) showed 94 % residual activity after 4 h at 50 °C and reusability till 12 cycles (Cabrera-Padilla et al. 2011). These supports were preferred because they are less tough and crystalline than polyhydroxybutyrate. 1, 4-Butenediol diglycidyl ether-activated byssus threads have been suitable basement for urease that increased pH stability and retained 50 % enzyme activity under dried conditions (Mishra et al. 2011). Eco-friendly supports of biological origin not only prevent cropping up of ethical issues, but also cut down the production costs. Of late, biocompatible mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) supports have been used for biocatalysis in energy applications owing to their long-term durability and efficiency (Popat et al. 2011).

 

Covalent binding

Covalent association of enzymes to supports occurs owing to their side chain amino acids like arginine, aspartic acid, histidine and degree of reactivity based on different functional groups like imidazole, indolyl, phenolic hydroxyl, etc. (D’Souza 1998; Singh 2009). Peptide-modified surfaces when used for enzyme linkage results in higher specific activity and stability with controlled protein orientation (Fu et al. 2011). Cyanogen bromide (CNBr)-agarose and CNBr-activated-Sepharose containing carbohydrate moiety and glutaraldehyde as a spacer arm have imparted thermal stability to covalently bound enzymes (Hsieh et al. 2000; Cunha et al. 2008). Highly stable and hyperactive biocatalysts have been reported by covalent binding of enzymes to silica gel carriers modified by silanization with elimination of unreacted aldehyde groups and to SBA-15 supports containing cage-like pores lined by Si–F moieties (Lee et al. 2006; Szymańska et al. 2009). Increase in half-life and thermal stability of enzymes has been achieved by covalent coupling with different supports like mesoporous silica, chitosan, etc. (Hsieh et al. 2000; Ispas et al. 2009). Cross-linking of enzymes to electrospun nanofibers has shown greater residual activity due to increased surface area and porosity. Use of such nanodiametric supports have brought a turning point in the field of biocatalyst immobilization (Wu et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2006; Ren et al. 2006; Li et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2008; Sakai et al. 2010). Covalent binding of alcohol dehydrogenase on attapulgite nanofibers (hydrated magnesium silicate) has been opted owing to its thermal endurance and variable nano sizes (Zhao et al. 2010). Biocatalytic membranes have been useful in unraveling effective covalent interactions with silicon-coated enzymes (Hilal et al. 2006). Cross-linked enzyme aggregates produced by precipitation of enzyme from aqueous solution by addition of organic solvents or ionic polymers have been reported (Sheldon 2011). Different orientations of immobilized enzyme on magnetic nanoclusters obtained by covalent binding have found their applications in pharmaceutical industries owing to their enhanced longevity, operational stability and reusability (Yusdy et al. 2009). Maintaining the structural and functional property of enzymes during immobilization is one of the major roles played by a cross-linking agent. One such agent is glutaraldehyde, popularly used as bifunctional cross-linker, because they are soluble in aqueous solvents and can form stable inter- and intra-subunit covalent bonds.

 

Affinity immobilization

Affinity immobilization exploits specificity of enzyme to its support under different physiological conditions. It is achieved by two ways: either the matrix is precoupled to an affinity ligand for target enzyme or the enzyme is conjugated to an entity that develops affinity toward the matrix (Sardar et al. 2000). Affinity adsorbents have also been used for simultaneous purification of enzymes (Ho et al. 2004). Complex affinity supports like alkali stable chitosan-coated porous silica beads and agarose-linked multilayered concanavalin A harbor higher amounts of enzymes which lead to increased stability and efficiency (Shi et al. 2003; Sardar and Gupta 2005). Bioaffinity layering is an improvisation of this technique that exponentially increases enzyme-binding capacity and reusability due to the presence of non-covalent forces such as coulombic, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, etc. (Sardar and Gupta 2005; Haider and Husain 2008).

 

Entrapment

Entrapment is caging of enzymes by covalent or non-covalent bonds within gels or fibers (Singh 2009). Efficient encapsulation has been achieved with alginate–gelatin–calcium hybrid carriers that prevented enzyme leakage and provided increased mechanical stability (Shen et al. 2011). Entrapment by nanostructured supports like electrospun nanofibers and pristine materials have revolutionalized the world of enzyme immobilization with their wide-ranging applications in the field of fine chemistry, biomedicine biosensors and biofuels (Dai and Xia 2006; Kim et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2009; Wen et al. 2011). Prevention of friability and leaching and augmentation of entrapment efficiency and enzyme activity by Candida rugosa lipase entrapped in chitosan have been reported. This support has also been reported to be non-toxic, biocompatible and amenable to chemical modification and highly affinitive to protein due to its hydrophilic nature (Betigeri and Neau 2002). Entrapment by mesoporous silica is attributed to its high surface area, uniform pore distribution, tunable pore size and high adsorption capacity (Ispas et al. 2009). Simultaneous entrapment of lipase and magnetite nanoparticles with biomimetic silica enhanced its activity in varying silane additives (Chen et al. 2011a). Sol–gel matrices with supramolecular calixarene polymers have been used for entrapment of C. rugosa lipase keeping in view their selective binding and carrying capacities (Erdemir and Yilmaz 2011). Lipases entrapped κ-carrageenan has been reported to be highly thermostable and organic solvent tolerant (Tümtürk et al. 2007; Jegannathan et al. 2010).


References

  • Ashly PC, Joseph MJ, Mohanan PV. Activity of diastase α-amylase immobilized on polyanilines (PANIs) Food Chem. 2011;127:1808–1813. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.068. [Cross Ref]
  • Ashraf H, Husain Q. Use of DEAE cellulose adsorbed and crosslinked white radish (Raphanus sativus) peroxidase for the removal of α-naphthol in batch and continuous process. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2010;64:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.10.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Ateş S, Doğan NS. Properties of immobilized phenylalanine ammonia lyase and investigation of its use for the prediagnosis of phenylketonuria. Turk J Biochem. 2010;35:58–62.
  • Bagal D, Karve MS. Entrapment of plant invertase within novel composite of agarose–guar gum biopolymer membrane. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;555:316–321. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.09.010. [Cross Ref]
  • Cao L (2006) Immobilized enzymes: past, present and prospects. In: Carrier-bound immobilized enzymes: principles, application and design. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/3527607668.ch1
  • Chang YK, Chu L. A simple method for cell disruption by immobilization of lysozyme on the extrudate-shaped Na Y zeolite. Biochem Eng J. 2007;35:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.12.019. [Cross Ref]
  • Chang MY, Juang RS. Use of chitosan-clay composite as immobilization support for improved activity and stability of β-glucosidase. Biochem Eng J. 2007;35:93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.01.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Chen GC, Kuan IC, Hong JR, Tsai BH, Lee SL, Yu CY. Activity enhancement and stabilization of lipase from Pseudomonas cepacia in polyallylamine-mediated biomimetic silica. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33:525–529. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0451-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen S, Song N, Liao X, Shi B. Immobilization of catalase on ferric modified collagen fibers. Chin J Biotechnol. 2011;27:1076–1081.
  • Chern JT, Chao YP. Chitin-binding domain based immobilization of D-hydantoinase. J Biotechnol. 2005;117:267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.02.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cordeiro AL, Lenk T, Werner C. Immobilization of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase onto reactive polymer films. J Biotechnol. 2011;154:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.04.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cunha AG, Fernández-Lorente G, Bevilaqua JV, Destain J, Paiva LM, Freire DM, Fernández-Lafuente R, Guisán JM. Immobilization of Yarrowia lipolytica lipase—a comparison of stability of physical adsorption and covalent attachment techniques. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008;146:49–56. doi: 10.1007/s12010-007-8073-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • D’Souza SF. Immobilized enzymes in bioprocess. Curr Sci. 1998;77:69–79.
  • Dai D, Xia L. Effect of lipase immobilization on resolution of (R, S)-2-octanol in non aqueous media using modified ultrastable-Y molecular sieve as support. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;134:39–49. doi: 10.1385/ABAB:134:1:39. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Daoud FBO, Kaddour S, Sadoun T. Adsorption of cellulase Aspergillus niger on a commercial activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Colloid Surface B Biointerfaces. 2010;75:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dey G, Nagpal V, Banerjee R. Immobilization of alpha-amylase from Bacillus circulans GRS 313 on coconut fiber. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2002;102–103:303–313. doi: 10.1385/ABAB:102-103:1-6:303. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dezott M, Innocentini-Mei LH, Durán N. Silica immobilized enzyme catalyzed removal of chlorolignins from eucalyptus kraft effluent. J Biotechnol. 1995;43:161–167. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(95)00110-7. [Cross Ref]
  • Diaz FJ, Jr, Balkus KJ. Enzyme immobilization in MCM-41 molecular sieve. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 1996;2:115–126. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(96)00017-3. [Cross Ref]
  • Dung NA, Huyen ND, Hang ND, Canh TT. Immobilization of urease on grafted starch by radiation method. Radiat Phys Chem. 1995;46:1037–1042. doi: 10.1016/0969-806X(95)00316-P. [Cross Ref]
  • Dutta S, Bhattacharyya A, De P, Ray P, Basu S. Removal of mercury from its aqueous solution using charcoal-immobilized papain (CIP) J Hazard Mater. 2009;172:888–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.085. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Elçin YM. Encapsulation of urease enzyme in xanthan–alginate spheres. Biomaterials. 1995;16:1157–1161. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(95)93580-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Emregul E, Sungur S, Akbulut U. Polyacrylamide–gelatin carrier system used for invertase immobilization. Process Biochem. 2006;38:27–30.
  • Erdemir S, Yilmaz M. Catalytic effect of calix[n]arene based sol–gel encapsulate or covalent immobilized lipases on enantioselective hydrolysis of (R/S)-naproxen methyl ester. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 2011
  • Flores-Maltos A, Rodríguez-Durán LV, Renovato J, Contreras JC, Rodríguez R, Aguilar CN. Catalytical properties of free and immobilized Aspergillus niger tannase. Enzyme Res. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fu J, Reinhold J, Woodbury NW. Peptide-modified surfaces for enzyme immobilization. PLoS ONE. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Girigowda K, Mulimani VH. Hydrolysis of galacto-oligosaccharides in soymilk by κ-carrageenan-entrapped α-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;22:437–442. doi: 10.1007/s11274-005-9053-9. [Cross Ref]
  • Gómez L, Ramírez HL, Neira-Carrillo A, Villalonga R. Polyelectrolyte complex formation mediated immobilization of chitosan–invertase neoglycoconjugate on pectin-coated chitin. Bioproc Biosyst Eng. 2006;28:387–395. doi: 10.1007/s00449-005-0043-y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Haider T, Husain Q. Concanavalin A layered calcium alginate–starch beads immobilized β-galactosidase as a therapeutic agent for lactose intolerant patients. Int J Pharm. 2008;359:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.03.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hernández MR, Kispert L, Ramírez ET, Rosales DR, Ulloa RZ, FerraraFerrara JT. Electron paramagnetic resonance analyses of biotransformation reactions with cytochrome P-450 immobilized on mesoporous molecular sieves. . Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29:919–924. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9328-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hilal N, Kochkodan V, Nigmatullin R, Goncharuk V, Al-Khatib L. Lipase-immobilized biocatalytic membranes for enzymatic esterification: comparison of various approaches to membrane preparation. J Membr Sci. 2006;268:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.039. [Cross Ref]
  • Ho LF, Li SY, Lin SC, Hsu WH. Integrated enzyme purification and immobilization processes with immobilized metal affinity adsorbents. Process Biochem. 2004;39:1573–1581. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00288-7. [Cross Ref]
  • Hosseinkhani S, Szittner R, Nemat-Gorgani M, Meighen EA. Adsorptive immobilization of bacterial luciferases on alkyl-substituted Sepharose 4B. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2003;32:186–193. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00282-X. [Cross Ref]
  • Hsieh HJ, Liu PC, Liao WJ. Immobilization of invertase via carbohydrate moiety on chitosan to enhance its thermal stability. Biotechnol Lett. 2000;22:1459–1464. doi: 10.1023/A:1005602812037. [Cross Ref]
  • Huang L, Cheng ZM. Immobilization of lipase on chemically modified bimodal ceramic foams for olive oil hydrolysis. Chem Eng J. 2008;144:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.05.015. [Cross Ref]
  • Huang XJ, Yu AG, Xu ZK. Covalent immobilization of lipase from Candida rugosa onto poly (acrylonitrile-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) electrospun fibrous membranes for potential bioreactor application. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99:5459–5465. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Huang XJ, Chen PC, Huang F, Ou Y, Chen MR, Xu ZK. Immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase on electrospun cellulose nanofiber membrane. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2011;70:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.02.010. [Cross Ref]
  • Idris A, Bukhari A. Immobilized Candida antarctica lipase B: hydration, stripping off and application in ring opening polyester synthesis. Biotechnol Adv. 2011 [PubMed]
  • Ispas C, Sokolov I, Andreescu S. Enzyme-functionalized mesoporous silica for bioanalytical applications. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;393:543–554. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2250-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jegannathan KR, Jun-Yee L, Chan ES, Ravindra P. Production of biodiesel from palm oil using liquid core lipase encapsulated in κ-carrageenan. Fuel. 2010;89:2272–2277. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.016. [Cross Ref]
  • Kahraman MV, Bayramoglu G, Kayaman-Apohan N, Güngör A. UV-curable methacrylated/fumaric acid modified epoxy as a potential support for enzyme immobilization. React Funct Polym. 2007;67:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.09.005. [Cross Ref]
  • Kamori M, Hori T, Yamashita Y, Hirose Y, Naoshima Y. Immobilization of lipase on a new inorganic ceramics support, toyonite, and the reactivity and enantioselectivity of the immobilized lipase. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2000;9:269–274. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(99)00105-8. [Cross Ref]
  • Kapoor M, Kuhad RC. Immobilization of xylanase from Bacillus pumilus strain MK001 and its application in production of xylo-oligosaccharides. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007;142:125–138. doi: 10.1007/s12010-007-0013-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Karagulyan HK, Gasparyan VK, Decker SR. Immobilization of fungal beta-glucosidase on silica gel and kaolin carriers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008;146:39–47. doi: 10.1007/s12010-007-8065-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Katwa LC, Ramakrishna M, Rao MRR. Spectrophotometric assay of immobilized tannase. J Biosci. 1981;3:135–142. doi: 10.1007/BF02702656. [Cross Ref]
  • Kawaguti HY, Manrich E, Sato HH. Production of isomaltulose using Erwinia sp. D12 cells: culture medium optimization and cell immobilization in alginate. Biochem Eng J. 2006;29:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.01.006. [Cross Ref]
  • Khan AA, Akhtar S, Husain Q. Direct immobilization of polyphenol oxidases on celite 545 from ammonium sulphate fractionated proteins of potato (Solanum tuberosum) J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2006;40:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.03.001. [Cross Ref]
  • Kibarer GD, Akovali G. Optimization studies on the features of an activated charcoal-supported urease system. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1473–1479. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)89771-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kim J, Jia H, Wang P. Challenges in biocatalysis for enzyme-based biofuel cells. Biotechnol Adv. 2006;24:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.11.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Klein MP, Scheeren CW, Lorenzoni ASG, Dupont J, Frazzon, Hertz PF. Ionic liquid-cellulose film for enzyme immobilization. Process Biochem. 2011;46:1375–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.02.021. [Cross Ref]
  • Koszelewski D, Müller N, Schrittwieser JH, Faber K, Kroutil W. Immobilization of ω-transaminases by encapsulation in a sol–gel/celite matrix. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2010;63:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.12.001. [Cross Ref]
  • Kumar AG, Perinbam K, Kamatchi P, Nagesh N, Sekaran G. In situ immobilization of acid protease on mesoporous activated carbon packed column for the production of protein hydrolysates. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1377–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kumari A, Kayastha AM. Immobilization of soybean (Glycine max) α-amylase onto chitosan and amberlite MB-150 beads: optimization and characterization. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2011;69:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.12.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Labus K, Turek A, Liesiene J, Bryjak J. Efficient Agaricus bisporus tyrosinase immobilization on cellulose-based carriers. Biochem Eng J. 2011;56:232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.07.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Lee DH, Park CH, Yeo JM, Kim SW. Lipase immobilization on silica gel using a cross-linking method. J Ind Eng Chem. 2006;12:777–782.
  • Lee CH, Lin TS, Mou CY. Mesoporous materials for encapsulating enzymes. NANO. 2009;4:165–179. doi: 10.1142/S1793292009001605. [Cross Ref]
  • Li SF, Chen JP, Wu WT. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membranes for lipase immobilization. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2007;47:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.04.010. [Cross Ref]
  • Liu CH, Lin YH, Chen CY, Chang JS. Characterization of Burkholderia lipase immobilized on celite carriers. J Taiwan Inst Chem E. 2009;40:359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.10.004. [Cross Ref]
  • Liu X, Luo L, Ding Y, Xu Y, Li F. Hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on the immobilization of horseradish peroxidase on γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles/chitosan film-modified electrode. J Solid State Electrochem. 2010;15:447–453. doi: 10.1007/s10008-010-1120-y. [Cross Ref]
  • Magnan E, Catarino I, Paolucci-Jeanjean D, Preziozi-Belloy L, Belleville MP. Immobilization of lipase on a ceramic membrane: activity and stability. J Membr Sci. 2004;241:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.05.023. [Cross Ref]
  • Matto M, Husain Q. Calcium alginate–starch hybrid support for both surface immobilization and entrapment of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) peroxidase. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2009;57:164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2008.08.011. [Cross Ref]
  • Mirouliaei M, Nayeri H, Shariat SZS, Atar AM. Biospecific immobilization of lactoperoxidase on Con A–sepharose 4B. Sci Iran. 2007;14:303–307.
  • Mishra N, Pithawala K, Bahadur A. Byssus Thread: a novel support material for urease immobilization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;165:1568–1576. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9376-y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mislovicová D, Masarova J, Vikartovska A, Germeiner P, Michalkova E. Biospecific immobilization of mannan–penicillin G acylase neoglycoenzyme on Concanavalin A-bead cellulose. J Biotechnol. 2004;110:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mitchell S, Ramírez JP. Mesoporous zeolites as enzyme carriers: synthesis, characterization, and application in biocatalysis. Catal Today. 2011;168:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.10.058. [Cross Ref]
  • Namdeo M, Bajpai SK. Immobilization of α-amylase onto cellulose-coated magnetite (CCM) nanoparticles and preliminary starch degradation study. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2009;59:134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.02.005. [Cross Ref]
  • Pahujani S, Kanwar SS, Chauhan G, Gupta R. Glutaraldehyde activation of polymer nylon-6 for lipase immobilization: enzyme characteristics and stability. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:2566–2570. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.042. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Persson M, Wehtje E, Adlercreut P. Immobilisation of lipases by adsorption and deposition: high protein loading gives lower water activity optimum. Biotechnol Lett. 2000;22:1571–1575. doi: 10.1023/A:1005689002238. [Cross Ref]
  • Pogorilyi RP, Siletskaya EY, Goncharik VP, Kozhara LI, Zub YL. Immobilization of urease on the silica gel surface by sol–gel method. Russ J Appl Chem. 2007;80:330–334. doi: 10.1134/S1070427207020310. [Cross Ref]
  • Popat A, Hartono SB, Stahr F, Liu J, Qiao SZ, Lu GQ. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for bioadsorption, enzyme immobilisation and delivery carriers. Nanoscale. 2011;3:2801–2818. doi: 10.1039/c1nr10224a. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Raafat AI, Araby E, Lotfy S. Enhancement of fibrinolytic enzyme production from Bacillus subtilis via immobilization process onto radiation synthesized starch/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate hydrogel. Carbohyd Polym. 2011;87:1369–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.029. [Cross Ref]
  • Ramani K, Karthikeyan S, Boopathy R, Kennedy LJ, Mandal AB, Sekaran G. Surface functionalized mesoporous activated carbon for the immobilization of acidic lipase and their application to hydrolysis of waste cooked oil: isotherm and kinetic studies. Process Biochem. 2011
  • Rani AS, Das MLM, Satyanarayana S. Preparation and characterization of amyloglucosidase adsorbed on activated charcoal. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2000;10:471–476. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(99)00116-2. [Cross Ref]
  • Rao MN, Kembhavi AA, Pant A. Immobilization of endo-polygalacturonase from Aspergillus ustus on silica gel. Biotechnol Lett. 2000;22:1557–1559. doi: 10.1023/A:1005632917259. [Cross Ref]
  • Rao CS, Prakasham RS, Rao AB, Yadav JS. Functionalized alginate as immobilization matrix in enantioselective L (+) lactic acid production by Lactobacillus delbrucekii. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008;149:219–228. doi: 10.1007/s12010-007-8052-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ren G, Xu X, Liu Q, et al. Electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)/glucose oxidase biocomposite membranes for biosensor applications. React Funct Polym. 2006;66:1559–1564. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.05.005. [Cross Ref]
  • Rochefort D, Kouisni L, Gendron K. Physical immobilization of laccase on an electrode by means of poly (ethyleneimine) microcapsules. J Electroanal Chem. 2008;617:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.01.027. [Cross Ref]
  • Romaskevic T, Vikantiene E, Budriene S, Ramanaviciene A, Dienys G. Immobilization of maltogenase onto polyurethane microparticles from poly (vinyl alcohol) and hexamethylene diisocyanate. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2010;64:172–176. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.09.013. [Cross Ref]
  • Rosa CC, Cruz HJ, Vidal M, Oliva AG. Optical biosensor based on nitrite reductase immobilised in controlled pore glass. Biosens Bioelectron. 2002;17:45–52. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5663(01)00263-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sabbani S, Hedenström E, Nordin O. The enantioselectivity of Candida rugosa is influenced by the particle size of the immobilizing support material Accurel. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2006;42:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.05.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Sahney R, Puri BK, Anand S. Enzyme coated glass pH-electrode: its fabrication and applications in the determination of urea in blood samples. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;542:157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.069. [Cross Ref]
  • Sakai S, Liu Y, Yamaguchi T, Watanabe R, Kawabe M, Kawakami K. Immobilization of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase onto electrospun polyacrylonitrile fibers through physical adsorption and application to transesterification in nonaqueous solvent. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32:1059–1062. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0279-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sardar M, Gupta MN. Immobilization of tomato pectinase on Con A–Seralose 4B by bioaffinity layering. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2005;37:355–359. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.03.007. [Cross Ref]
  • Sardar M, Roy I, Gupta MN. Simultaneous purification and immobilization of Aspergillus niger xylanase on the reversibly soluble polymer Eudragit(TM) L-100. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2000;27:672–679. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00257-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Satar R, Matto M, Husain Q. Studies on calcium alginate–pectin gel entrapped concanavalin A–bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) peroxidase complex. J Sci Ind Res India. 2008;67:609–615.
  • Serralha FN, Lopes JM, Lemos F, Prazeres DMF, Aires-Barros MR, Cabral JMS, Ribeiro FR. Zeolites as supports for an enzymatic alcoholysis reaction. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 1998;4:303–311. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(98)00069-1. [Cross Ref]
  • Sheldon RA. Characteristic features and biotechnological applications of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:467–477. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3554-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Shen Q, Yang R, Hua X, Ye F, Zhang W, Zhao W. Gelatin-templated biomimetic calcification for β-galactosidase immobilization. Process Biochem. 2011;46:1565–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.04.010. [Cross Ref]
  • Shi Q-H, Tian Y, Dong X-Y, Bai S, Sun Y. Chitosan-coated silica beads as immobilized metal affinity support for protein adsorption. Biochem Eng J. 2003;16:317–322. doi: 10.1016/S1369-703X(03)00095-0. [Cross Ref]
  • Shioji S, Hanada M, Hayashi Y, Tokami K, Yamamoto H. Continuous surface modification of silica particles for enzyme immobilization. Adv Powder Technol. 2003;14:231–245. doi: 10.1163/156855203763594001. [Cross Ref]
  • Singh BD. Biotechnology expanding horizons. India: Kalyani; 2009.
  • Soleimani M, Khani A, Najafzadeh K. α-Amylase immobilization on the silica nanoparticles for cleaning performance towards starch soils in laundry detergents. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2011;74:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.07.011. [Cross Ref]
  • Spahn C, Minteer SD. Enzyme immobilization in biotechnology. Recent Pat Eng. 2008;2:195–200. doi: 10.2174/187221208786306333. [Cross Ref]
  • Szymańska K, Bryjak J, Jarzębski AB. Immobilization of invertase on mesoporous silica to obtain hyper active biocatalysts. Top Catal. 2009;52:1030–1036. doi: 10.1007/s11244-009-9261-x. [Cross Ref]
  • Tümtürk H, Karaca N, Demirel G, Şahin F. Preparation and application of poly(N, N-dimethylacrylamide-co-acrylamide) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylamide)/κ-Carrageenan hydrogels for immobilization of lipase. Int J Biol Macromol. 2007;40:281–285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.07.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Vaillant F, Millan A, Millan P, Dornier M, Decloux M, Reynees M. Co-immobilized pectinlyase and endocellulase on chitin and nylon supports. Process Biochem. 2000;35:989–996. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00131-X. [Cross Ref]
  • Vamvakaki V, Chaniotakis NA. Immobilization of enzymes into nanocavities for the improvement of biosensor stability. Biosens Bioelectron. 2007;22:2650–2655. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.10.040. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang HY, Hettwer DJ. Cell immobilization in κ-carrageenan with tricalcium phosphate. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;14:1827–1838. doi: 10.1002/bit.260240809. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang ZG, Wan LS, Liu ZM, Huang XJ, Xu ZK. Enzyme immobilization on electrospun polymer nanofibers: an overview. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2009;56:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2008.05.005. [Cross Ref]
  • Wang L, Wei L, Chen Y, Jiang R. Specific and reversible immobilization of NADH oxidase on functionalized carbon nanotubes. J Biotechnol. 2010;150:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.07.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wen H, Nallathambi V, Chakraborty D, Barton SC. Carbon fiber microelectrodes modified with carbon nanotubes as a new support for immobilization of glucose oxidase. Microchim Acta. 2011;175:283–289. doi: 10.1007/s00604-011-0684-2. [Cross Ref]
  • Wu SC, Lia YK. Application of bacterial cellulose pellets in enzyme immobilization. J Mol Catal B-Enzym. 2008;54:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.12.021. [Cross Ref]
  • Wu L, Yuan X, Sheng J. Immobilization of cellulase in nanofibrous PVA membranes by electrospinning. J Membr Sci. 2005;250:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.024. [Cross Ref]
  • Xiangli Q, Zhe L, Yinglin Z, Zhengjia Z. Immobilization of activated sludge in poly (ethylene glycol) by UV technology and its application in micro-polluted wastewater. Biochem Eng J. 2010;50:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2010.03.007. [Cross Ref]
  • Xing GW, Li XW, Tian GL, Ye YH. Enzymatic peptide synthesis in organic solvent with different zeolites as immobilization matrices. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:3517–3522. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00261-1. [Cross Ref]
  • Yusdy, Patel SR, Yap MGS, Wang DIC. Immobilization of L-lactate dehydrogenase on magnetic nanoclusters for chiral synthesis of pharmaceutical compounds. Biochem Eng J. 2009;48:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2009.07.017. [Cross Ref]
  • Zhao Q, Hou Y, Gong GH, Yu MA, Jiang L, Liao F. Characterization of alcohol dehydrogenase from permeabilized brewer’s yeast cells immobilized on the derived attapulgite nanofibers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;160:2287–2299. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8692-y. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zimmermann YS, Shahgaldian P, Corvini PFX, Hommes G. Sorption-assisted surface conjugation: a way to stabilize laccase enzyme. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:169–178. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3534-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

No comments:

Notes